Friday, 15 May 2015



OVER THE LAST TWO DECADES, one of Wisbech's most ardent campaigners has been Victoria Gillick. Here is PART THREE of her report on the effects of immigration on Wisbech.
I make no claim over the accuracy of the statistics, and I neither endorse or refute her personal conclusions
. The report is long and detailed, so it will be published in sections over the next week or so. I have put statistical information in blue font. The remainder are Mrs Gillick's own views. YOUR VIEWS ARE WELCOME, both for and against, and you can make them known via the contact form at the bottom of the blog, or via Twitter - https://twitter.com/wisbechevenmore

                                           FUNDING THE IMPACT

In March 2009 Hazel Blears, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, set up the Migration Impacts Fund (MIF)9 to help public bodies cope with the mass immigration insisted on by the Government. A total of £70m was made available, financed (so they said) by a compulsory £50 levy on immigration application fees. Funding was allocated to local projects which "....would bring benefits to the settled community as well as the migrants".  The MIF was axed in October 2010 by the incoming Coalition Government on the grounds that "....local authorities themselves are in the best position to decide how to address the impacts of migration on their communities". 

Three years later, in 2012, the Coalition opened up its own pot of gold, the Rogue Landlords Fund,10 this time presumably to assist public services cope with the additional 200,000 migrants from Romania and Bulgaria discovered already living here, and whose inflow rose by a further 61,000 during 2013-14.
6.
                                      MIGRATION IMPACTS FUND

But what a generous honey-pot the MIF was, with any number of bureaucratic fingers dipping into taxpayer's pockets for projects in Cambridgeshire and Fenland, none of which incidentally brought any "benefits to the settled community". Here's how
£1.343 million was spent from the Fund. 11  

                              CAMBRIDGESHIRE  COUNTY  COUNCIL  (2009-10)

To help Police/Health services with emergency accommodation and casework support.......£370,025                           
To combat migrant overcrowding and exploitation...£140,000              

CAMBRIDGESHIRE  POLICE
  (2009-10)
Three multilingual PCSOs, to reduce police interpretation and translation costs.....£213,714          
The production of a DVD  training aid to assist staff who use interpreters....£30,000
Enhanced road safety education to migrant road users.....£20,000   
Specialist police for domestic abuse and sexual violence in migrant communities...£139,514
FENLAND  COUNCIL  (2009/11)  
To employ an additional Private Sector Housing Officer......£57,383
Rogue Landlord's Fund to tackle exploitation of migrant workers (20013/14).......£179,000
                                           THOMAS  CLARKSON  ACADEMY (2009-10)


To recruit multi-disciplinary staff to address pressures on services and families...£193,500
     



                                                           SLAV'S LABOURS LOST

                                            
But what of the migrants' home countries? Will the mass exodus of their young people, mostly to the UK, create prosperity and social justice in Eastern Europe? Poland, for instance, is a large country with a low birth rate. Since it joined the EU in 2004 its population of around 38 million has been deprived not only of 2,300 doctors, but three million able-bodied young workers, dealing a major body-blow to its construction and heavy industries. And even though its economy is being scaffolded by massive subsidies from Brussels, and benefits to some extent from the remittances sent home by its expatriate workers, this cannot compensate Poland in the long-run for the loss of so much of its skilled manpower. Meanwhile the importation of masses of unskilled labour from neighbouring countries even poorer than itself, has depressed Polish wage levels still further.
Now consider the Baltic states, with Lithuania losing at least a million of its young men and women (they already make up the bulk of migrants in Fenland), and this from a country smaller than Ireland, with a population of less than 4 million and one of the lowest birthrates in the  world. Little Latvia is half as small again. How can any of these ex-Soviet nations feasibly survive such a devastating depletion of their own 'prime seed corn' ?
Did Fenland Council ever consider this bigger European picture in its Migrant Population Strategy? Well, yes it did; but only insofar as the future of Eastern European economies might impact on the success of Fenland businesses:
'The extent to which (attracting migrant workers) can be sustained will invariably depend on conditions and circumstances prevailing in labour exporting countries.....A significant determinant of future patterns of labour migration to the UK will be the economic fortunes of labour exporting countries, especially the European Economic Area countries. In this context, a major unknown is the future economic conditions that are likely to prevail in the newest EU member States' 12 
In other words, we'll be all right Jack........just so long as their economies aren't.
*******************************************************
 

Monday, 11 May 2015



OVER THE LAST TWO DECADES, one of Wisbech's most ardent campaigners has been Victoria Gillick. Here is PART TWO of her report on the effects of immigration on Wisbech.
I make no claim over the accuracy of the statistics, and I neither endorse or refute her personal conclusions
. The report is long and detailed, so it will be published in sections over the next week or so. I have put statistical information in blue font. The remainder are Mrs Gillick's own views. YOUR VIEWS ARE WELCOME, both for and against, and you can make them known via the contact form at the bottom of the blog, or via Twitter - https://twitter.com/wisbechevenmore


                                                                 The Council's Strategy (2007-10)
 
Fenland District Council sprang into action the following year.....though not, alas, on behalf of local people. The sole purpose of the council's 'Migrant Population Strategy7 was to give all possible aid and succour to the foreign incomers. Their every need and every difficulty was considered in detail, the Council appearing to regard them as a small downtrodden minority, cruelly coerced here against their collective will. Thus migrant problems with housing and employment, welfare benefits and entitlements were agonised over, as also their need for interpreters, further education, skills training and qualification recognition, together with suggestions for their sport, art and leisure pursuits.  Even the migrants' apparent lack of family planning and sexual & mental healthcare were deemed worthy of conciliar scrutiny. Get everything really right for the foreign workers, avowed the caring Council, and '...multicultural community cohesion...' would assuredly follow. 
In pursuit of this happy daydream, Council officials began at once to organise a grand assembly of  45 organisations, the Diverse Communities Forum,8 to carry out research, produce leaflets and devise action plans. Verily, it was a bureaucratic heaven in the making. Here are just some of them:
Cambridgeshire Human Rights & Race Equality Support Service - Patient Advice & Liaison Service - Care Network - Drink Sense - Dial Drug - Strategic Migration Partnership - County Gypsy Traveller Manager - Migration Population Customer Advisers - The Ferry Project - Fenland Volunteer Centre - Citizens Advice Bureau - Job Centre Plus - Oasis Centre - Ormiston Trust - One Voice4 Travellers - Peterborough Race Equality Council - Richmond Fellowship - Roddons Housing - Rosmini Centre - Advice for Life - Mobile Europeans Taking Action - Fenland Travellers Forum - Learning & Skills Council - King's Lynn Area Resettlement Service - Fenland Play Strategy - CP Learning Trust - Single Information Portal Project - Adult Community Learning Fund - Keystone Development Trust - East of England Development Agency  etc etc etc..........                                                                                                                                 
                                       Government has spoken
 

Rack their brains as they might, local people would be unable to recall a comparable Council strategy ever having been devoted to their kith and kin, even though Fenland has been disadvantaged for decades, its uncomplaining inhabitants enduring the lowest wages and poorest housing, the worst health and most inadequate education in the entirety of East Anglia.                                                         
However, had local people ever actually seen the Migrant Population Strategy they would have realised at once why Fenland Council was so keen to assist the new foreign workforce rather than the indigenous one. Put simply, it was merely following the Labour Government's diktat, spelt out two years earlier by Immigration Minister, Des Browne, and quoted approvingly by the Tory-led Council in its Migrant Strategy:
"We are not and cannot be 'fortress Britain' if our businesses are to grow and prosper and our economy to thrive. We are a stronger player in an increasingly international market place and....we are successfully attracting the workers that Britain needs."                                                           
                                                                                                               (Des Browne MP    Feb. 2005)
5.
                                           It's the economy stupid
The Immigration Minister's call for a migrant-fuelled economy was reiterated nineteen times in Fenland Council's Migrant Population Strategy.  The following five samples will suffice:
*  'Migrant workers....make a huge contribution to the rural economy, often filling posts where there is no suitable or insufficient local labour. Without this labour force many businesses would not be able to work at full capacity.'
*  'It is clear that local companies regard migrant workers as key components in their strategy for the current and future prosperity of the Fens.'
*  'Working with employers is a key for many reasons.....Many employers are keen to work with us as they see this as a means of helping their migrant workers, and will in turn help sustain their business.'
* 'Migrant workers bring £360m to the Region's economy. One in three are employed in food, agriculture, construction, hotels, catering, cleaning and manufacture, making them a highly significant element within Fenland's local economy.'                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
* 'The increasing dependence of Fenland employers on migrant labour and the continuing attractions of the Fens as a preferred destination for migrant workers, coupled with economic factors in EU accession countries, suggests that migrant labour is likely to remain an important feature of the Fenland labour force for the foreseeable  future.'
*************************************


Somewhere in the midst of all this eulogy to migrant labour, the Council did manage a brief note of concern for the dire situation it was creating for local people, devoting three whole lines to Fenland's "indigenous unskilled" school-leavers and their slim chance of ever finding employment.


But it was only crocodile tears. For the whole aim and purpose of the Council's migrant strategy was quite clearly to assist local businesses achieve a smooth cut-and-paste transition: replacing the local workforce with a settled, compliant, and far cheaper foreign one.  


                                TO BE CONTINUED                                                               

Sunday, 10 May 2015



OVER THE LAST TWO DECADES, one of Wisbech's most ardent campaigners has been Victoria Gillick. She came to  nationwide attention when she challenged the rights of doctors to give confidential contraceptive advice to teenage girls without bringing parents into the loop.
She spoke at the controversial public meeting over immigration a couple of years ago. Now she has painstakingly compiled a report on how she sees immigration affecting Wisbech and the surrounding area. The information and statistics contained in the report are, she says, all via Freedom of Information requests. She has asked me to host the report on this blog, and I am happy to do so, but I make no claim over the accuracy of the statistics, and I neither endorse or refute her personal conclusions. The report is long and detailed, so it will be published in sections over the next week or so. I have put statistical information in blue font. The remainder are Mrs Gillick's own views. YOUR VIEWS ARE WELCOME, both for and against, and you can make them known via the contact form at the bottom of the blog, or via Twitter - https://twitter.com/wisbechevenmore

PART ONE OF THE FOILING CABINET REPORT

DATA ACQUIRED THROUGH
              FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS  
                  
 What's going on in Fenland?
Impoverishment
Very flat, the Fens. Sea-bed flat in fact, being the drained and reclaimed marshland encircling the southern and eastern sides of the Wash. Transformed over the centuries into super-fertile farmland, the Fens stretch in a wide arc from the Norfolk port of King's Lynn, southwards to Cambridge, across to Peterborough and up to Boston in Lincolnshire. The district known as Fenland lies in the north-west corner of Cambridgeshire, abutting Norfolk and Lincolnshire and encompassing twenty-nine villages and the four market towns of Wisbech, March, Chatteris and Whittlesey.                                                                                                  
So much for the geography. This Bulletin, however, is about Fenland's history: its recent, troubling history, which truth to say, differs only in scale to what's been happening all over the country: Government engendered, business orientated, taxpayer funded impoverishment.
Fenland's troubles began, as so many untoward outcomes have begun, with the European Union   stipulating unfettered movement of peoples between Member States. Our government eagerly complied and our public authorities obligingly cooperated. At the receiving end.....Joe Public, ignored, neglected and vilified. We shall therefore start with a brief look at the impact on Fenland as a whole, followed by a more detailed scrutiny of one of its market towns: Wisbech.
      
                                       CONTENTS                                                     Page

                                       FENLAND
Demographic trends 1981-2001 ............................ 2
East European immigration ................................... 3
  'Migrant Population Strategy' 2007....................... 4/5
  'Migration Impacts Fund' ...................................... 5/6
The migrants' home countries ..............................  6
                                     
                                       WISBECH
Background ............................................................ 7
Population & age structure ..................................... 8
                                      Local  numbers ....................................................... 9
School population.................................................. 10
 Healthcare (GPs and Hospital) .............................. 11
Accommodation  ................................................... 12
Social Housing ...................................................... 12
Wages .................................................................... 13
Unemployment .....................................................  14
Alcohol .................................................................  15
Crime ....................................................................  16
                                      Costing the UK & the County ............................... 17
Costing the District ................................................ 18
Impoverishing Wisbech ..........................................19
                                      References
2.
FENLAND

Fenland grows and prepares food for the nation, its farms and food-processing factories always needing extra horny-handed workers during the hectic harvest months. Hiring additional seasonal labour, whether local people, students, traveller families or foreigners on work permits, has thus been part and parcel of Fenland's yearly cycle for generations.
Between 1981-2001 Fenland's indigenous population swelled by over sixteen thousand souls, rising from 67,175 to 83,549.1  During those twenty years, however, the age structure in the area had seen a decline in the number of younger people, and a corresponding increase in older ones:
    1981-2001
*  Under-20s decreased ...... 28.0 - 24%
*  20-29s decreased.............12.4 - 10.3%
*  30-39s rose..................... 13.8 - 14.6% 
*  40-59s rose..................... 23.8  - 26.7%
*  Over-60s rose................. 22.0 - 24.5%,   
                                                          

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS


This demographic change was not unique to Fenland, but was part of a national trend consequent on low birth rates in the 1970s and '80s. To maintain stable population growth a country needs a birth rate of 2.1 children. The post-war baby-boom of 1946-47 had a rate of around 2.4 children which led to another, smaller, baby-bulge twenty years later. Parliament, persuaded by birth control lobbyists that Britain was on the brink of a catastrophic population explosion, sought to head-off the disaster by legalising abortion in 1967 and making contraception available on the NHS  in 1973. The upshot was a mega Baby-Bust as annual birth rates plummeted to 1.7 children, the lowest level ever recorded in Britain.2  By 1984 the number of children aged 0-15 was almost two million fewer than in 1971, resulting in thousands of school closures during the following decade.
In 1988 government advisers alerted the business world to the stark fact that by 1995 the number of 18-21 year-olds would have fallen by 1.2 million.3 Most employers nevertheless ignored the warnings, preferring instead to blame their labour problems on young people themselves, publicly lambasting "the youth of today" as lazy, incompetent, work-shy slackers.  How stupid is that?
As ever, the Government then made matters worse by scrapping Student Maintenance Grants, traditionally topped-up by holiday and weekend jobs, in favour of bank-run Loan Schemes. Thereafter most students chose simply to ratchet-up their huge bank debt all year round.
By the turn of the Millennium there was indeed a dramatic fall in 15-29 year-olds, with Fenland  suffering a drop of almost 1,800 in this critical age group. The labour shortage did have one beneficial effect however, for it obliged notoriously tight-fisted Fen farmers and factory bosses to pay their workforce a decent living wage for a change: more than double the Minimum Wage.
Then out of the blue, early in the new Century, something unprecedented happened in Fenland.
It all began in 2002 when Brussels granted EU membership to eight East European nations. Most of the other big beasts in Europe (Germany, France, Spain, Italy) put a 7-year block on migrants from Eastern Europe pouring across their borders in search of jobs and homes. But British industry, being ever mindful that cheap immigrant labour was the quick way to easy profits, couldn't wait to have them here, and persuaded the Government to post a more or less open invitation to the new Member States, saying in effect: "Come one, come all.....our economy needs YOU!"                                                         
The entreaty was all but irresistible, thanks to a previous ruling from the European Court of Human Rights, which in 1985 declared that anyone entitled to live in another country was also entitled to bring every other member of their extended family with them.
3.

 
MASS MIGRATION
                                                                                                                                                                                                   
The outcome was predictable; nay, it was intentional. By 2003 thousands of Portuguese families suddenly began arriving in Britain, emigrating here because (they said) they had been ousted from their agricultural jobs back home by a sudden incoming wave of Polish workers. Very soon, however, the Polish tide changed direction and began sweeping over Britain instead, inundating Fenland farms and factories in particular. Following fast in its wake came an even bigger tsunami of Lithuanians, Latvians and ethnic Russians. At least a million were in the UK by 2006. Nor were these newcomers arriving only as temporary seasonal workers. A large and growing proportion intended to settle here......permanently. 
Fen farmers and factory bosses were ecstatic. Landlords and gangmasters couldn't believe their luck. Mini-wages were back again for everyone......plus multi-lets at maxi-rents for the foreigners.  Lovely big bucks and loud hoorahs all round.
Only one nasty fly in the ointment: the hefty government increases in Fenland's Business Rates, which have risen 63% in the last ten years, from around £14 million to almost £23 million by 2013.  
                                                                                                                                                                        
INVISIBLE IMMIGRANTS
The Office of National Statistics (ONS) hasn't a clue how many people are living in the UK nowadays. Its 2011 Census recorded over one million residents were from Eastern Europe, but in April 2014 it finally admitted to underestimating their numbers by a massive 350,000.4 
Meanwhile the Census for Fenland had the population increasing to 95,262, of which a mere 4,439  were East European nationals, including 665 migrant children and pensioners. This hopelessly inaccurate head count also occurred in the two migrant-heavy districts of Lincolnshire, with Boston said to have only 6,839 East Europeans, and Spalding just 5,241.5
In short, most of the East European workers had simply ignored the Census altogether. The trouble was, these wholly erroneous ONS statistics are still being used by Cambridgeshire officials to formulate all their policies and funding for Fenland. [See Page 8: 'Uncounted migrants']
                                                                                                                        
COMMUNITIES BALKANISED
Generally speaking, when immigrants are relatively few in number they will make an effort to blend into the landscape by adopting the language and culture of the host community. But East Europeans in Fenland were legion and increasing year on year, and consequently felt neither the need nor the desire to speak English and integrate. Being employed en masse in fields and factories, and then lodged together in shared houses, each different Teutonic/Slavic nationality sticking closely with its own, served to Balkanise the newcomers still more. Before long the Poles and Lithuanians had established numerous cafés, shops and supermarkets in Fenland, employing their own people to sell their own imported food in their own language. The Polish migrants were further segregated by being granted separate church services, conducted by their own priests in their own native tongue. Meanwhile Lithuanians acquired a couple of Wisbech pubs, one of whose licensees was ordered by the police to remove a somewhat hostile notice from its windows: 'No British here'.
By 2006 the strain of living among so many uncommunicative foreigners was beginning to tell on the Fenland populace, particularly in Wisbech where most of the food processing and packaging industries were based, and three-quarters of the migrants were living.6 Here, not only were local workplaces becoming filled with East Europeans, but whole neighbourhoods as well. 
Something had to be done. But what, and how.....and by whom?
4.

TO BE CONTINUED

Friday, 12 December 2014


PICKWICK'S GUIDE TO POLITICAL SPEAK

After a succession of posts about dark deeds from our shared Wisbech past, I am reminded that Pickwick has neglected one vital part of our Shared Agenda/Prospectus/Vision Statement/ Policy Guidelines (substitute any piece of modern management bullshit with which you are most comfortable) So, with a General Election - if not exactly looming - a flicker on the horizon, this post is by way of a public service broadcast. You will hear many of this phrases over the next six months, and you may need this essential cut-out-and-keep guide as a translation aid. This installment is free, but future issues will be competitively priced at £7.99, payable to Pickwick's offshore ethical investment account.




After a long and thorough consultation… - "My cabinet colleague has come up with a great idea…"
Community cohesion - what happens when migrants are allowed to burn the British flag and other national symbols, and then play the race card when challenged.
Fall for - what ordinary people do when they vote for an idea or policy not approved of by the mainstream parties.
Immigration - something which is great for businessmen, farmers and crooked landlords.
Foreign Aid - a system whereby working people in one country subsidise palaces, executive motor cars and space programmes in another country
Free speech - a state of affairs when certain people in the community can advocate beheading their opponents, and someone who opposes that idea is arrested for 'hate crime'
I hear what you are saying - "Your opinion is worth jack **** to me."
Laughter - what politicians resort to when their logical arguments fall on deaf ears, as in 'Still Laughing at UKIP'.
Let me make one thing perfectly clear - "I'm not answering your question, but I'm going to spin all around the houses with a load of gobbledygook."
Local elections - a process whereby a minority of people in a city, village or urban area decide who will run their affairs of the whole community for the next four years.
People in my community are genuinely feeling the pinch - "I have an all expenses paid flat in Islington, a family home in the Cotswolds, and a villa in Tuscany."
Political Party - a club where the members have to agree with every decision it makes, no matter how stupid or ruinous to the common good.
Populism - something that ordinary people believe is important, but which mainstream politicians think is bad for us - and them.
Postal voting poses certain challenges - "Strewth, the local Labour party has bought all the Asian votes again!"
Socialism - a form of government which takes money out of your pocket, and puts it into the pocket of someone who is either lazy, inept or criminal.
The electorate are vital stakeholders in our shared future - "Phew! Back in power for another four years! Take the 'phone off the hook, Miranda."
The exploitation of migrant labour is repellent - "Have you collected the rent from the Filipino nanny yet, Giles?"
The NHS is the jewel in our crown - "Anyone know where the nearest pawnbroker is…?"
The xxxx candidate conducted a fair and honourable campaign - "LMAO - the xxxx candidate only got 54 votes!"
We must work together, across party lines, for the good of the village/town/city/country - "I'm going to take the mickey out of my political opponents at every opportunity, and belittle them as much as possible."
We're listening to parents - We are telling parents to make trouble for those Lefty idiots, the teachers.
We must resist the inflationary pressure on wages - "That's a 10% pay rise for us MPs, then!"
We will not let this matter rest - "When the media have got tired of this story, we'll just carry on, same-old, same-old
."